Hi, friends!
Often, when drawing a chart (or in Tree View), I'd like to include families of in-laws, even though they're not blood relatives. Eg, your uncle's wife was previously married to another man and had kids with them. Well, those are important people to the family, and I want them all to be shown when I draw the trees.
I get that by doing so, you potentially link the entire world's population into the tree. But I don't have the entire planet in my data file :-)
This is what I would call "Relative View", even though your definition of that is just blood relatives. But these "in-laws" and "cousins of cousins" are important for every family sub-tree I put together, and I've been struggling to find an easy way to include them, like a simple checkbox.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Dave
Often, when drawing a chart (or in Tree View), I'd like to include families of in-laws, even though they're not blood relatives. Eg, your uncle's wife was previously married to another man and had kids with them. Well, those are important people to the family, and I want them all to be shown when I draw the trees.
I get that by doing so, you potentially link the entire world's population into the tree. But I don't have the entire planet in my data file :-)
This is what I would call "Relative View", even though your definition of that is just blood relatives. But these "in-laws" and "cousins of cousins" are important for every family sub-tree I put together, and I've been struggling to find an easy way to include them, like a simple checkbox.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
Dave
Comment